News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:New Hampshire set to pilot voting machines that use softw... by DoingIsLearning on Friday November 04, 2022 @10:20AM (#33467125)
> Maybe it's not perfect, but (at least to me) seems like a step in a good direction.

Is it? Provided you have a working democratic state with checks and auditing, what is the problem that voting machines solve?

The level of guarantees that you have with a paper vote is hard to surpass and the inconvenience of paper vote is not that big considering how often voting occurs (even in the extreme case of Swiss style referendums).

Re:New Hampshire set to pilot voting machines that use softw... by falafelite on Friday November 04, 2022 @10:48AM (#33467639)
Is a paper-vote a reference to literally marking a piece of paper, or a human counting said piece of paper? Sorry if that's a dumb question, just want to make sure I follow. It seems like this tech works with marking a piece of paper that is then read by a machine. I suppose if the paper is kept, perhaps it's nice from the point of view of the election-handling-folks to automate the counting process, but be able to audit the paper ballots?
Re:New Hampshire set to pilot voting machines that use softw... by davoneus on Friday November 04, 2022 @02:03PM (#33471198)
>Provided you have a working democratic state with checks and auditing, what is the problem that voting machines solve?

It solves the problem of waiting days or weeks for a result. It solves the problem of multiple languages on a ballot. It solves the problem of visually-impaired voters accessing the voting machine, it solves the problem of incorrectly filled out voting sheets (hanging-chat).

Hell, that's just off the top of my head, and I'm sure others can contribute more.