Re:Section 230: Mend it, don’t end it (2020)
by pchristensen on Wednesday November 02, 2022 @07:27PM
(#33444284)
I don’t necessarily agree with Sacks, but most discussion of 230 is just braying nonsense. This one is at least worth discussing.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Section 230: Mend it, don’t end it (2020)
by tptacek on Wednesday November 02, 2022 @07:30PM
(#33444324)
I disagree, for reasons I've given all across the thread. His "incitement" stuff is fatally broken. His "fighting words" stuff is fatally broken. His "defamation" stuff presumes prior restraint for defamation. It's a mess.