I mean sort of opinion, it’s a pretty solid fact that there is less TO read, maybe you can argue that doesn’t make it more readable.
Go
package main
import "fmt"
func main() {
fmt.Println("Hello, World")
}
print(“Hello World”)
As an aside, I can't deny that on a per-line or even per-scope basis Python is often more readable. But at the meta level where you're dealing with an entire codebase, which to me is more relevant, the structural aspects come into play and that's where it devolves into pure opinion.
In other words, comparing for readability across a handful of lines is not valuable unless you're only dealing with codebases which are also only a handful of lines.
Of course the main driver of this thread is script files, and for readability Python probably does win as they tend to be short. But I'd argue that as long as something is readable enough (which Go is) then other factors like performance may need to come into the decision.
And Go builds virtually instantly, meaning for any non-trivial script (and if you prefer Go of course) it's a virtual certainty that given the negligible build time and far better performance a Go 'script' done this way will massively out-perform a Python script.
In other words if you don't accept 4 (and I like Python so not a dig) and you have a need for 2 then 3 can become irrelevant and Go is a good choice.