Invasive Diffusion: one unwilling illustrator found her turned into an AI model

Re:Invasive Diffusion: one unwilling illustrator found her t... by kriro on Wednesday November 02, 2022 @05:40AM (#33433289)

If you think about future business cases, my guess is if I'm in the content creation business I'd hire some artist to create inputs for my ML model to train. And I'd be the only one with access to these inputs (in the beginning). Or think about it the other way around. If I'm an artist I buy a commodity AI-art-generation-engine and feed it with my work and I can create infinite items in my own style for (digital) sale.

It'll all be about time to market and brand building. I could even see a world where the originals of the input creator would sell quite well as classic modern artworks. Imagine for a second a world where 3D assets get created this way. I'm pretty sure fans of popular games would shell out good money for originals from "the artist behind the Witcher 7 asset engine" if the trajectory of human development goes as I see it going.

Also...artists are going to create art no matter if it makes financial sense or not. In fact I'd argue that's the difference between art and design :P

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Invasive Diffusion: one unwilling illustrator found her t... by datagram on Wednesday November 02, 2022 @05:34PM (#33443224)

> if I'm in the content creation business I'd hire some artist to create inputs for my ML model to train

That's a reasonable way to go about things. The problem is that right now the status quo is that you just take artists' work without their consent and use it to train your model.

[ Parent | on HN ]