>• reproduction of the work in various forms, such as printed publications or sound recordings;
>• distribution of copies of the work;
>• public performance of the work;
>• broadcasting or other communication of the work to the public;
>• translation of the work into other languages; and
>• adaptation of the work, such as turning a novel into a screenplay
None of these rights, to me, indicate that copyright protects the input. The AI model is not reproducing any specific works, distributing copies of it, performing it in public, broadcasting it, translating it to another language, or adapting the work from one format to another.
I am not a lawyer, but my understanding of copyright law is that this is explicitly the opposite.
https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_909_2016.pdf
>• reproduction of the work in various forms, such as printed publications or sound recordings; >• distribution of copies of the work; >• public performance of the work; >• broadcasting or other communication of the work to the public; >• translation of the work into other languages; and >• adaptation of the work, such as turning a novel into a screenplay
None of these rights, to me, indicate that copyright protects the input. The AI model is not reproducing any specific works, distributing copies of it, performing it in public, broadcasting it, translating it to another language, or adapting the work from one format to another.