Invasive Diffusion: one unwilling illustrator found her turned into an AI model

Re:Invasive Diffusion: one unwilling illustrator found her t... by noobermin on Tuesday November 01, 2022 @09:08PM (#33430171)

I am going to go ahead and say it, some of you people are so far up your own ass that you don't realize it is the exact same thing. All of you are saying it's unique because you code but you don't understand art and can't pick out the things that are clearly copied from artists because it isn't exactly the same.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Invasive Diffusion: one unwilling illustrator found her t... by friend_and_foe on Wednesday November 02, 2022 @02:21PM (#33440544)

I don't understand art, you're right, at least from an artist's perspective. Maybe you can enlighten me.

So my current perspective is this: if a picture is drawn in a style similar to yours for example, that's not infringing, but if it's just a scrapbook collage of cutouts of your art it is, except where it's fair use. Would that be right?

So the same applies, if an AI actually can help people write code by learning from existing code, that's fine, but if an AI just copy pastes code blocks that's not.

Where am I going wrong here?

[ Parent | on HN ]