Re:Invasive Diffusion: one unwilling illustrator found her t...
by stevewatson301 on Wednesday November 02, 2022 @01:32AM
(#33431739)
Just because you can buy a knife to kill someone discreetly, doesn't mean that we should just give up on the idea of making murder illegal.
Of course "killing someone" and "copying someone's artwork" are at different levels, however, I'm sure artists would beg to differ.
Re:Invasive Diffusion: one unwilling illustrator found her t...
by 314 on Wednesday November 02, 2022 @02:45AM
(#33432074)
I don't think there is any work on that yet, but if the model is known it should be possible to derive the probability that a particular image is the output from it.
Re:Invasive Diffusion: one unwilling illustrator found her t...
by wnkrshm on Wednesday November 02, 2022 @03:38AM
(#33432385)
It's inevitable that someone comes up with methods to detect generated images, since a lot of political (Edit: and financial) capital hinges on that. If AI image generation is inevitable, then methods to analyze images wrt. known generators are even more inevitable.
Re:Invasive Diffusion: one unwilling illustrator found her t...
by CrimsonRain on Wednesday November 02, 2022 @06:36AM
(#33433708)
> GAN
And your point is invalid in long term.
Re:Invasive Diffusion: one unwilling illustrator found her t...
by nickthegreek on Wednesday November 02, 2022 @11:56AM
(#33437883)
Ive produced over 5000 images on my local SD install. Currently, there are many dead giveaway if you produced the art with it. Specifically around hands, feet, holding things, pupil directions. Of course these things will get better with time, but currently there are many things that exposure generative art.
I already have Stability running on my PC. I generate an image with it. How do you know the output comes from Stability? Answer that, please.
Second, a worldwide draconian ban on AI image training and generation just isn't going to happen. Very few legal things are coordinated worldwide, and copyright law is incredibly low on the list.
Even training without consent can be addressed. Google trained some of their AI from Google Photos. Which they made free for unlimited use so that us fools would produce billions of images, accept the terms we don't even read and voila: AI legally trained.