Invasive Diffusion: one unwilling illustrator found her turned into an AI model

Re:Invasive Diffusion: one unwilling illustrator found her t... by endisneigh on Tuesday November 01, 2022 @07:15PM (#33429100)

> But nobody cares if you copy a nice code pattern from a GPL code and apply it to your own code base

this is not true, smh. See Oracle vs. Google.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Invasive Diffusion: one unwilling illustrator found her t... by int_19h on Tuesday November 01, 2022 @11:46PM (#33431214)

Oracle v. Google involved actual Java (declarations) code being copied; that it was a derived work wasn't seriously disputed there.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Invasive Diffusion: one unwilling illustrator found her t... by endisneigh on Wednesday November 02, 2022 @09:27AM (#33435403)

CoPilot will return actual GPL code verbatim.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Invasive Diffusion: one unwilling illustrator found her t... by int_19h on Wednesday November 02, 2022 @11:51AM (#33437801)

Yes, and that's why I personally believe that the model itself should be considered a derived work of such code. But OP was specifically talking about "code patterns".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Invasive Diffusion: one unwilling illustrator found her t... by endisneigh on Wednesday November 02, 2022 @11:55AM (#33437875)

Copying the code verbatim would fall under copying the code pattern. You talking about changing the name of the variables or something?

[ Parent | on HN ]