News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Taxonomy Is Hard by Mezzie on Tuesday November 01, 2022 @11:47AM (#33422819)
> I, personally, personally cannot see this as a problem that can be solved. Maybe you are better.

Both library science and cognitive linguistics have solutions for/discuss this problem.

Re:Taxonomy Is Hard by dropofwill on Tuesday November 01, 2022 @12:11PM (#33423232)
I would say what they call 'composition by capability' is a theory of categorization, in fact similar to Wittgenstein's family resemblance theory.

That said, it's not obvious that the underlying data model needs or should map to a theoretical model for how human cognition works. Maybe it should and it's worth considering the theoretical landscape before setting out, but there are other features that come into play.

I know very little about library science, but I assume they take a more practical (for this task) approach to this that's worth looking into.

Re:Taxonomy Is Hard by Mezzie on Tuesday November 01, 2022 @01:29PM (#33424392)
You should definitely look into it, especially if you like pedantic arguments.