News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Taxonomy Is Hard by bambax on Tuesday November 01, 2022 @09:22AM (#33420827)
I think the problem is there's no demand, not that incumbents are fighting it. But I also think it's weird and a mystery that nobody wants good search.

The trust issue you mention may be a clue.

Re:Taxonomy Is Hard by TeMPOraL on Tuesday November 01, 2022 @09:40AM (#33421087)
> I think the problem is there's no demand

Computing is a supply-driven market. The demand is there, it's just partially latent, partially ignored. Vast majority of technology users have no choice but to choose from what's being offered, and the minority of tech-savvy users with opinions are increasingly too small a niche to support "power user" tools.

Re:Taxonomy Is Hard by PaulHoule on Tuesday November 01, 2022 @09:35AM (#33421019)
There isn't even an open source product with traction.
Re:Taxonomy Is Hard by zozbot234 on Tuesday November 01, 2022 @09:59AM (#33421322)
ripgrep solves the "precise full-text search" problem quite nicely.
Re:Taxonomy Is Hard by PaulHoule on Tuesday November 01, 2022 @10:07AM (#33421429)
There is that, and locate.

Most people have Word Documents, PDF files, and other things that need a more complex indexing strategy. Also a lot of people have lots of image and audio files which pose their own challenges, namely indexing textual metadata and possibly some indexing of the content.