Re:Twitter to lay off 25% of workforce in first round of job...
by freejazz on Monday October 31, 2022 @04:18PM
(#33412344)
The board decided to sell, not the C-level suite because they do not have that power.
Re:Twitter to lay off 25% of workforce in first round of job...
by iav on Monday October 31, 2022 @04:52PM
(#33412896)
The C suite has an incredible amount of influence to block a deal with a non-strategic acquirer like Elon. The threat of all executives resigning en masse can knee cap a business.
Re:Twitter to lay off 25% of workforce in first round of job...
by freejazz on Monday October 31, 2022 @04:54PM
(#33412954)
That's true, but it wasn't the question.
Re:Twitter to lay off 25% of workforce in first round of job...
by smcl on Monday October 31, 2022 @05:37PM
(#33413588)
What was the question? I don’t see any
Re:Twitter to lay off 25% of workforce in first round of job...
by rst on Monday October 31, 2022 @05:00PM
(#33413057)
Parag Agrawal, as CEO, was also a member of the board. (This is pretty common practice, among both private and public companies.)
Re:Twitter to lay off 25% of workforce in first round of job...
by smcl on Monday October 31, 2022 @05:48PM
(#33413734)
That Matt Levine article in archive.ph: https://archive.ph/JrNdE
Now, at some level, it still stinks that the CEO is getting paid so many tens of millions of dollars for less than a year's worth of work. To solve that, you'd have to cut CEO pay in the first place, because just removing the parachute would incentivize clinging to their existing paychecks.