News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Twitter to lay off 25% of workforce in first round of job... by hyperpape on Monday October 31, 2022 @03:32PM (#33411501)
Matt Levine has a good explanation (https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-10-31/elon-m...), which is that they receive a golden parachute for a simple reason. Their self-interest was to say "la-la-la, we can't hear you" when Musk comes trying to buy Twitter. That would've given them a chance to maintain high paid positions for years. Instead, they sold to him, knowing they'd probably be given the boot.

Now, at some level, it still stinks that the CEO is getting paid so many tens of millions of dollars for less than a year's worth of work. To solve that, you'd have to cut CEO pay in the first place, because just removing the parachute would incentivize clinging to their existing paychecks.

Re:Twitter to lay off 25% of workforce in first round of job... by freejazz on Monday October 31, 2022 @04:18PM (#33412344)
The board decided to sell, not the C-level suite because they do not have that power.
Re:Twitter to lay off 25% of workforce in first round of job... by iav on Monday October 31, 2022 @04:52PM (#33412896)
The C suite has an incredible amount of influence to block a deal with a non-strategic acquirer like Elon. The threat of all executives resigning en masse can knee cap a business.
Re:Twitter to lay off 25% of workforce in first round of job... by freejazz on Monday October 31, 2022 @04:54PM (#33412954)
That's true, but it wasn't the question.
Re:Twitter to lay off 25% of workforce in first round of job... by smcl on Monday October 31, 2022 @05:37PM (#33413588)
What was the question? I don’t see any
Re:Twitter to lay off 25% of workforce in first round of job... by rst on Monday October 31, 2022 @05:00PM (#33413057)
Parag Agrawal, as CEO, was also a member of the board. (This is pretty common practice, among both private and public companies.)
Re:Twitter to lay off 25% of workforce in first round of job... by smcl on Monday October 31, 2022 @05:48PM (#33413734)
That Matt Levine article in archive.ph: https://archive.ph/JrNdE