Re:SourceHut terms of service updates, cryptocurrency projec...
by woodruffw on Monday October 31, 2022 @10:58AM
(#33406681)
I'm very familiar with the poem, thanks. Take a look at the last line!
> If a devops team for a pro-choice campaign was being censored on SourceHut because it does not align with Drew's moral compass, nobody would defend this with "well, they can just run their own git hosting services, so what's the problem?"
Actually, I suspect that's precisely how some people would defend it. And why wouldn't they? It's completely independent from agreement or disagreement with the position.
Re:SourceHut terms of service updates, cryptocurrency projec...
by zeroclip on Monday October 31, 2022 @11:08AM
(#33406846)
Yikes, I hope that people on HN would not defend such a decision this way.
Re:SourceHut terms of service updates, cryptocurrency projec...
by woodruffw on Monday October 31, 2022 @11:15AM
(#33406964)
Well, me neither, but that doesn't mean I don't expect it :-)
Re:SourceHut terms of service updates, cryptocurrency projec...
by jakelazaroff on Tuesday November 01, 2022 @02:30AM
(#33417716)
Why not? Should Drew be forced to provide ongoing labor for anyone who asks?
A lot of people building crypto tools also are happy to use centralized services like GitHub, SourceHut, GitLab, because they might not be satisfied with the alternatives.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came_...