Re:A 28-byte “hello, world” program assembled with DEBUG.EXE...
by neilv on Monday October 31, 2022 @12:51AM
(#33402198)
Eventually, Borland came out with the Turbo Debugger and Turbo Assembler, "only" $100, which was a steal compared to Microsoft tools.
Re:A 28-byte “hello, world” program assembled with DEBUG.EXE...
by shric on Monday October 31, 2022 @01:36AM
(#33402399)
AH = 0? I only recall AH = 4C?
That would exit the program with AL being the exit value. I'm not aware of AH = 0?
Sadly, I used to write these kinds of programs with a hex editor, so "B4 4C CD 21" is etched into my brain even though "CD 20" was shorter.
Re:A 28-byte “hello, world” program assembled with DEBUG.EXE...
by ataylor284_ on Monday October 31, 2022 @02:24AM
(#33402607)
4C is correct. My INT 21 function codes memory is a bit fuzzy.
However, I always ended my programs with INT 20 instead of RET, or INT 21 with AH = 0. RET worked both for standalone programs or in debug, but there was one exception: if you ran your code repeatedly in debug with G 100. It would work the first time, but IIRC the stack wasn't reinitialized to return to the correct place on subsequent G commands. I spent a lot of time typing, running and patching in a single session and INT 20 always worked correctly.