News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:IBM setting out to build an electronic brain by drunkpotato on Saturday December 10, 2011 @10:57PM (#3339237)
Interesting but color me skeptical of claims that they "[take] computing concepts to a whole new level". This would be fantastic if they could do it, and I think asynchronous event-driven circuits are definitely a move in the right direction, but the supposed "blog" they link to is nearly content-free marketspeak. The hyperbolic claims and lack of proven results set off little warning bells on this PR piece.
Re:IBM setting out to build an electronic brain by shmageggy on Saturday December 10, 2011 @11:50PM (#3339290)
If you check out the "publications" tab there is more substantial content. The first one in the list is a pretty readable yet detailed description of their approach and philosophy.
Re:IBM setting out to build an electronic brain by drunkpotato on Sunday December 11, 2011 @12:18AM (#3339334)
That is a fair point, and I admit that I read into the blog post more than was actually claimed.
Re:IBM setting out to build an electronic brain by bfrs on Saturday December 10, 2011 @11:35PM (#3339277)
I hope this doesn't end as another "cat brain" fiasco:

http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2898229

Since the original critique by Henry Markram has been removed from the bluebrain website, I wish if anyone can confirm that the pasted exchange actually took place.

Re:IBM setting out to build an electronic brain by bfrs on Sunday December 11, 2011 @07:38PM (#3341659)
Here is an authentic source for Markram's critique of the "Cat out of the bag" paper:

http://news.discovery.com/tech/cat-brain-computer-hype.html

Re:IBM setting out to build an electronic brain by itmag on Sunday December 11, 2011 @08:25AM (#3340001)
I just got a mental image of Eliezer Yudkowski and Linda Hamilton assaulting IBM headquarters at night with the help of a buff Austrian combat cyborg.
Re:IBM setting out to build an electronic brain by stiff on Sunday December 11, 2011 @02:32AM (#3339548)
This is old news, and gets much more publicity in the media that it probably deserves, but the vision of a "brain-like" computer certainly appeals to a majority of readers. Previously:

http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2898229

http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2908802

http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2899299

Re:IBM setting out to build an electronic brain by dconway on Sunday December 11, 2011 @04:46AM (#3339735)
When they make one that's safe for implant, I am so getting it.
Re:IBM setting out to build an electronic brain by _yobq on Saturday December 10, 2011 @11:12PM (#3339254)
I'd love to commercialize this by connecting our brains to a farm of electronic brains via an API. Brain Power on Demand(tm)! :)
Re:IBM setting out to build an electronic brain by aaronbrethorst on Saturday December 10, 2011 @11:59PM (#3339298)
Brainpower on demand? I think we already have that, and it's called Mechanical Turk or Crowdflower ;-)
Re:IBM setting out to build an electronic brain by jacquesm on Sunday December 11, 2011 @07:17AM (#3339918)
It is called 'Ask HN'.
Re:IBM setting out to build an electronic brain by easy_rider on Sunday December 11, 2011 @12:22PM (#3340444)
Yahoo Answers :-)
Re:IBM setting out to build an electronic brain by easy_rider on Sunday December 11, 2011 @11:40AM (#3340348)
Well hope they are as smart as they think they are. In 2009 they thought the word mating started with an F !
Re:IBM setting out to build an electronic brain by jderick on Sunday December 11, 2011 @01:21PM (#3340593)
I think they simply substituted the PG version of the real word here.
Re:IBM setting out to build an electronic brain by easy_rider on Sunday December 11, 2011 @03:52PM (#3341039)
Yeah, It was kinda ironic on my part. Laughed pretty hard about the PG'ing though, they could have thrown in a little bit more irony themself, but yeah it's forbes :)