When I read it, I see a devastating critique of SAFe from every big name I trust in the Agile space. I would never recommend SAFe. But no-one is asking me…
How would a potential customer of SAFe see it?
Right now somewhere in the world there is probably a C level exec of a large org reading a powerpoint about how transformative and agile SAFe is. They’re probably in their mid fifties and have never worked in tech before. They know agile is good, but any large IT project is risky.
What would they see if they read this? Would it mean anything to them? Or would they see a bunch names they don’t recognise, and a list of failed IT projects blaming SAFe.
How would a potential customer of SAFe see it?
Right now somewhere in the world there is probably a C level exec of a large org reading a powerpoint about how transformative and agile SAFe is. They’re probably in their mid fifties and have never worked in tech before. They know agile is good, but any large IT project is risky.
What would they see if they read this? Would it mean anything to them? Or would they see a bunch names they don’t recognise, and a list of failed IT projects blaming SAFe.