Re:Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staf...
by deaddodo on Saturday October 29, 2022 @10:10PM
(#33390272)
It is still ethically a no-go. Tesla isn't a consultation firm and they haven't done this type of work ever except for personal interests of the CEO. It doesn't take a particularly skilled lawyer to establish a conflict of interest there.
Re:Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staf...
by kcplate on Saturday October 29, 2022 @11:40PM
(#33390802)
Happens all the time and the only reason anyone cares about this time is because Musk. If Twitter pays a FMV to Tesla for any resources, and as long as the Tesla board doesn’t care (which they won’t), this is a non-issue. Doesn’t matter what kind of “firm” Tesla is.
Re:Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staf...
by deaddodo on Sunday October 30, 2022 @01:37AM
(#33391434)
If the CEO of Ford used Ford resources to purchase a rental property for themselves, people would definitely be talking about it. I would even flip your claim and say the only reason people are dismissing this is because it's Musk.
Re:Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staf...
by steveBK123 on Saturday October 29, 2022 @10:10PM
(#33390281)
Ah yea I’m sure Musk ran it by HR, compliance and legal.. had all the paperwork squared away on both sides and is making sure time tracking is done carefully.
or he just winged it and grabbed some engineers and said “come with me”…
Which is more in character for him?
Re:Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staf...
by shalmanese on Saturday October 29, 2022 @11:45PM
(#33390833)
Tesla definitely seems like the kind of place where they love hiring HR people who habitually push against powerful higher ups.
Re:Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staf...
by FireBeyond on Sunday October 30, 2022 @01:29AM
(#33391378)
> Musk ran it by HR, compliance and legal
Right? Tesla hasn't had General Counsel since 2019, and is not looking for one.
Unless Twitter is paying handsomely for the consultation?