News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Elon Musk owns Twitter: The story so far by ReptileMan on Friday October 28, 2022 @09:23PM (#33380007)
There is a lot of cruft without touching the engineering department. And there are always those two guys in every team that when they call sick - productivity of the team increases.
Re:Elon Musk owns Twitter: The story so far by archon810 on Friday October 28, 2022 @09:30PM (#33380050)
The question is, who will decide who to fire? And how many of the wrong people to fire will get fired in the process?
Re:Elon Musk owns Twitter: The story so far by seanhunter on Saturday October 29, 2022 @01:36AM (#33381290)
Even if that were true the problem with the approach he has taken is that by leaking that you are going to perform swinging cuts, everyone who can get another job immediately starts looking so by the time you actually get around to doing the layoff the team has self-selected and you only have “those two guys” left.
Re:Elon Musk owns Twitter: The story so far by ReptileMan on Saturday October 29, 2022 @02:05AM (#33381423)
I doubt it because the whole vibe of Musk so far is that the axe will fall on the culture warriors and activists. I think the productive and less political engineers know they are safe.

And the zeitgeist seems to have changed lately - so jobs may not be so easier to come by, especially for employees that may be too political for the employer.

Re:Elon Musk owns Twitter: The story so far by hackerfromthefu on Sunday October 30, 2022 @09:05AM (#33394146)
This! Can't believe how most of the discussion misses this point.
Re:Elon Musk owns Twitter: The story so far by toxik on Saturday October 29, 2022 @02:27AM (#33381522)
As a counterpoint, if you lay off 75% of your workers, you can now pay the remaining 25% three times more salary.
Re:Elon Musk owns Twitter: The story so far by runlevel1 on Saturday October 29, 2022 @02:45AM (#33381624)
...and be on-call 3x as much.