News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Elon Musk owns Twitter: The story so far by throw_nbvc1234 on Friday October 28, 2022 @06:53PM (#33378985)
> In my opinion, the content of a tweet (is it spam ? is it abusing the platform ?) matters way more than wether it’s a bot or a human doing the spamming/abuse.

What about replies and retweets? EX: If you have high quality (or good faith) content that's supported/attacked by bots vs real people.

Re:Elon Musk owns Twitter: The story so far by H8crilA on Friday October 28, 2022 @07:30PM (#33379318)
I'm posting this only to further decrease the upvote/comment ratio.
Re:Elon Musk owns Twitter: The story so far by makeitdouble on Friday October 28, 2022 @08:35PM (#33379733)
I kinda wish engagement had less effect on content visibility and having a swarm of bots "attacking" a comment wasn't decisive.

Talking about HN comments, some have extremely bad but feel good takes that will garner a huge first wave of upvotes, to then get beaten down as it got more attention, to perhaps get some more sympathy votes as timezones shift.

The interesting part to me is the comment can go all the cycles because it stays there, is still visible even when flagged to death and can be rescued.

That's also how I read reddit, with downvoted to death comments and posts in the timeline. People who care enough should probably do the same for Twitter as well.

Disclaimer: I am not politicaly engaged so have less exposure to the nastier battles where thousands of people shout a each other. I still don't understand why anyone would go there in their free time.

Re:Elon Musk owns Twitter: The story so far by sroussey on Friday October 28, 2022 @10:22PM (#33380369)
I think TikTok nailed this. They will promote posts to their home page that do not have lots of engagement but but are high quality for the site.