News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Duck DNS – About by cgjohn on Friday October 28, 2022 @04:18AM (#33368907)
Thoughts on using services like these? Especially in relation to privacy and security.

I ended up going for my own VPS with a WireGuard server for my home server to connect to.

Re:Duck DNS – About by ryan29 on Friday October 28, 2022 @04:38AM (#33369028)
My biggest concern would be someone scanning CT logs to find hosts with hobbyist grade security. That’s not meant to insult hobbyists, but they might be a juicy target for immediately exploitation after a zero day hits. To be clear, it’s the same for any well known DynDNS domain.

Besides that, I looked at every DynDNS system I could find back in the summer. There were only 3 that I was happy with; Hurricane Electric, Google Domains, and a pair of self hosted Bind servers.

If you want the best, simple solution, and it doesn’t need to be completely free, register a domain with Google domains. If anyone knows of limitations, let me know.

Namecheap maxes out at 150 DynDNS hosts :-(

Re:Duck DNS – About by tssva on Friday October 28, 2022 @09:29AM (#33371142)
I prefer to use Cloudflare for my DNS including dynamic DNS. I happen to have my domains registered through them but it is not a requirement to use their free tier.
Re:Duck DNS – About by rovr138 on Friday October 28, 2022 @04:31AM (#33368980)
I don’t see much issues with privacy or security with a service like this.

They don’t get traffic going through them. They mainly exist to point to an IP. With enough data they have information on how an ISP rotates IP’s and who they’ve gone to.

In your case, with a WireGuard VPS, all traffic goes through the server. That’s a very different setup.

In their case, a request goes to them at a regular interval and they update the IP the dns record points to. That’s it.

When someone requests the domain, they simply respond with an IP. At most, if there’s little caching, they could get frequency of usage.

Re:Duck DNS – About by ignoramous on Friday October 28, 2022 @04:49AM (#33369112)
> They don’t get traffic going through them.

A rouge DNS can reply to select queries with the IP of a middleware that can TLS proxy and/or MitM that traffic.

We built such a thing mostly for anti-censorship purposes (bypass IP blocks): https://github.com/celzero/midway#demo

Re:Duck DNS – About by wink on Friday October 28, 2022 @05:20AM (#33369290)
I use duckdns and the only service I'm accessing through that CNAME is ssh, which checks host keys, so it doesn't have to be a problem.
Re:Duck DNS – About by drexlspivey on Friday October 28, 2022 @10:49AM (#33372031)
wouldn’t that invalidate the cerificate?
Re:Duck DNS – About by piperswe on Friday October 28, 2022 @11:13AM (#33372406)
If they control the domain, they can get a new valid certificate
Re:Duck DNS – About by Tajnymag on Friday October 28, 2022 @04:35AM (#33369011)
There's no routing of the actual traffic, only basic DNS forwarding. Of course it's not meant for business production services, but it's decent for homelab. Especially considering for how long has DuckDNS been operating.
Re:Duck DNS – About by password4321 on Friday October 28, 2022 @09:59AM (#33371464)
Best to pay the money for your own domain name, and find a free service to point it where you need to.

You can keep jumping to new gimmick first year deals on unusual TLDs but they are often considered spammy and always gouge on renewal pricing.