Re:NY Supreme Court reinstates all fired unvaccinated employ...
by typeofhuman on Wednesday October 26, 2022 @03:47PM
(#33348429)
Both scenarios result in total human collapse; which we have not seen. So perhaps your math is wrong.
Re:NY Supreme Court reinstates all fired unvaccinated employ...
by LatteLazy on Wednesday October 26, 2022 @04:06PM
(#33348663)
Why would 10 people per 1000 dying lead to "total human collapse"
Re:NY Supreme Court reinstates all fired unvaccinated employ...
by ben_w on Thursday October 27, 2022 @04:28AM
(#33354791)
While the point is correct, I don't think this reasoning is sound.
If exponential growth keeps going until you run out of people to infect, then you get to everyone in both scenarios.
What actually changes the total number of infections, is that when enough people are non-infectious by either vaccination or prior infection, the remainder no longer get exposed.
The other society scale effect is that the slower infection rate (even in the absence of the primary benefit of the various vaccines) means the integrated utilisation of finite healthcare resources is spread out over time, so the instantaneous usage is lower, and as many places were at or above capacity during the pandemic that would also save lives.
If I have covid and no vaccine and meet 100 people,I infect 50. Those 50 go on to infect another 1000 because that's what people do in cities, before running out of steam. 1%, aka 10 people die. Plus all the cost of dealing with the rest of those hospitalised and the long covid and the injuries etc.
If I have covid and the vaccine and meet 100 people I infect 38 (24% less). only 760 people get infected as a knock on. So now only 7.6 people die.
2.4 deaths seems like a lot of deaths to just accept because otherwise someone might lose a job...