Re:Redis for win32 and the Microsoft patch
by burgerbrain on Friday December 09, 2011 @12:24PM
(#3334546)
"going to your manager and asking to fire up a linux VM in a Microsoft shop will probably get you reprimanded (or laughed at)"
Whoa whoa whoa. It's narrow minded to not dance around the narrow mindedness of others?
There is certainly a problem that needs solving here, but it's not Redis on windows.
Re:Redis for win32 and the Microsoft patch
by politician on Friday December 09, 2011 @12:51PM
(#3334671)
Why should antirez feel compelled to support Microsoft's enterprise customers without compensation at the cost of significant complexity? The incentives are all wrong.
Re:Redis for win32 and the Microsoft patch
by beagle3 on Friday December 09, 2011 @11:10AM
(#3334196)
I like it how "not catering for bureaucratic needs of the unpaying enterprise who has no problem paying Microsoft an others, even though there's a perfectly simple technical solution" is narrow minded.
And it's been very long since I've seen an "enterprise" that didn't already have linux deployments. Can you name a few?
I believe that thought is narrow-minded because you are not thinking in terms of enterprise. This would probably work in a startup, or maybe even in a mid-size business. But in an enterprise, going to your manager and asking to fire up a linux VM in a Microsoft shop will probably get you reprimanded (or laughed at). I would love to use linux all day, but we can't do it as there is no freedom to. With a Windows port, I could create a business case for it and get a VM provisioned with Windows Server on it within a short period of time. Honestly, as bad as this sounds, money for small things like Windows licenses is not an issue when it comes to enterprise.