Re:LFMs and LFSPs (Michael Vanier via PG)
by tuukkah on Monday July 09, 2007 @05:02PM
(#33336)
Do we admit that smart people aren't infinitely smart? With LFSPs, I often get the feeling I'm too stupid for a language, but in many ways it's better than often feeling the language is too stupid for me.
Who cares whether you got 31 or 32 bits? The different operator names are because Ocaml doesn't have operator overloading. For statically type-checked and "overloaded" operators and functions, see type classes in Haskell.
Who cares whether you got 31 or 32 bits? The different operator names are because Ocaml doesn't have operator overloading. For statically type-checked and "overloaded" operators and functions, see type classes in Haskell.