News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:TNT Is Not TeX by _delirium on Friday December 09, 2011 @04:53AM (#3333201)
TeX is an odd case, because it has been replaced in much of the world, with the almost-sole exception of mathematical and computer science academic writing. The vast majority of people doing typesetting of anything else (e.g. books, even at academic presses like MIT Press) will use a newer typesetting engine (one of the high-priced proprietary ones).

My guess is it just takes far too much implementation effort to replicate (or even significantly modify) something like TeX relative to the fairly small userbase of academic-paper-writers. The low-level typesetting-related parts in particular are pretty hairy and hard to get right, so experimentation tends to happen more in higher-level macro packages.

Re:TNT Is Not TeX by atto on Friday December 09, 2011 @09:26AM (#3333758)
What are some of the high-priced proprietary ones?
Re:TNT Is Not TeX by _delirium on Friday December 09, 2011 @09:39AM (#3333805)
Afaik, Adobe InDesign and Quark dominate the market, with InDesign being the de-facto standard. They're not as high-priced or numerous as they used to be, though; there were a bunch of sold-to-professionals-only packages in the 80s, but there seems to have been a convergence between desktop publishing and professional print prepress, so everyone just uses InDesign or Quark now.
Re:TNT Is Not TeX by jakobe on Friday December 09, 2011 @12:02PM (#3334451)
I think FrameMaker would be another one.