News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Salary Transparency. Parent comment

Re:Salary Transparency by maerF0x0 on Monday October 24, 2022 @10:15PM (#33325371)
Except that the big corpos have proven their willingness to collude.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Salary Transparency by lotsofpulp on Monday October 24, 2022 @10:18PM (#33325388)
In that case, the buyer already knows your pay due to the collusion, so the claim that pay transparency can allow a buyer to lowball a seller is moot.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Salary Transparency by BurningFrog on Monday October 24, 2022 @10:52PM (#33325605)
You mean that one case with Jobs and Schmidt in 2005?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Salary Transparency by minhazm on Tuesday October 25, 2022 @12:10AM (#33326109)
> Adobe, Apple Inc., Google, Intel, Intuit, Pixar, Lucasfilm and eBay

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Tech_Employee_Antitrust_L...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Salary Transparency by BurningFrog on Tuesday October 25, 2022 @05:21PM (#33336330)
True.

Still, one single case 15 years ago doesn't prove the whole industry is permanently tainted.

[ Parent | on HN ]