If I were a content farm I'd probably use text cut and pasted from text models, but I'd never heard of the Mikkelson Twins and it was interesting to learn about them.
yes, so? can't we parse beyond the opening statement of the comment, and see the rest of its content?
can't a comment not reiterate in its opening statement what the author already said (to e.g. show the commentor's aggrement)?
this is too formulaic and pedantic a response
But that's not the form of the comment. It begins with "I think there’s a good chance it was ghost written by a content farm"!