Re:Premultiplied Alpha vs. Not-Premultiplied Alpha Blending ...
by Sesse__ on Sunday October 23, 2022 @07:19AM
(#33306105)
Applying a blur filter to a premultiplied image is (very subtly) _correct_, at least if the goal is to emulate what happens if you used a physical lens to blur the same image. Not only does postmultiplied alpha mess up the correct pixel values (as the original post shows), but even without alpha, you get a “halo” that is weird and unphysical.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Premultiplied Alpha vs. Not-Premultiplied Alpha Blending ...
by im3w1l on Sunday October 23, 2022 @09:39AM
(#33306911)
I think corysama had the right of it, you need to do all the operations in linear colors, i.e.
original image -> convert to linear color space -> multiply alpha -> blur -> composite -> possibly convert back to sRGB if needed
The wrong way I meant was
original image -> multiply alpha -> gamma-correct-blur -> composite
where gamma-correct-blur = convert to linear color space -> blur filter -> convert to sRGB