News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Colleges that ditched admission tests find it harder to f... by lupire on Saturday October 22, 2022 @07:44PM (#33303235)
Citation needed. MIT Dean of Admissions said the opposite:

"He says the standardized exams are most helpful for assisting the admissions office in identifying socioeconomically disadvantaged students who are well-prepared for MIT’s challenging education, but who don’t have the opportunity to take advanced coursework, participate in expensive enrichment programs, or otherwise enhance their college applications."

https://news.mit.edu/2022/stuart-schmill-sat-act-requirement...

Re:Colleges that ditched admission tests find it harder to f... by etrevino on Saturday October 22, 2022 @08:30PM (#33303449)
What you quoted above actually kind of reinforces GP's point. And if you read the article you cited it agrees with GP.

> [W]hat I think many people outside our profession don’t understand is how unfortunately unequal all aspects of secondary education are in this country. And unlike some other inequalities — like access to fancy internships or expensive extracurriculars — our empirical research shows the SAT/ACT actually do help us figure out if someone will do well at MIT.

> It turns out the shortest path for many students to demonstrate sufficient preparation — particularly for students with less access to educational capital — is through the SAT/ACT, because most students can study for these exams using free tools at Khan Academy, but they (usually) can’t force their high school to offer advanced calculus courses, for example. So, the SAT/ACT can actually open the door to MIT for these students, too.

Re:Colleges that ditched admission tests find it harder to f... by Rebelgecko on Sunday October 23, 2022 @12:25AM (#33304560)
Most helpful for socially disadvantaged students vs least inequitable don't seem contradictory to me