Re:What Eric Schmidt actually said
by toddheasley on Thursday December 08, 2011 @09:32AM
(#3329170)
Gruber's assessment is more reasonable, but watching the video, I completely fail to see the controversy. In context, Schmidt's response seems almost humble, and he seems to be addressing two separate concerns raised by the question: 1) The actual challenges for developers (in terms of both the software being good enough to deliver killer apps and the store being able to generate money for developers) and 2) The perceived uncoolness of Android/perceived lack of developer interest
On the first point, he's conceding that Android, up until ICS, fell short. On the second point, he's saying that, whether Android suddenly sparks developer interest or not, it's gonna be on so many devices that developers won't be able to say no (to the fame and fortune). I can't say whether he'll be correct, but I think he could be. It's an honest, if not direct, answer to the question asked -- and doesn't come across as a threat.
Re:What Eric Schmidt actually said
by andrewfelix on Thursday December 08, 2011 @08:25AM
(#3328946)
Gruber analyses the same mangled quote. I'm not commenting on the interpretation.
Consider if it had been a Job's quote. I suspect Gruber would have been more thorough.
Having said that, I think you're probably right regarding a follow-up from Gruber.
He links to and quotes the same source article one post previous:
http://daringfireball.net/linked/2011/12/07/schmidt
However, I agree; given Gruber's track record I expect him to post a correction soon.
Based on his track record, I would not be surprised to see a follow-up addressing the accuracy or otherwise of the quoted words.