Stable Diffusion 1.5

Re:Stable Diffusion 1.5 by machinawhite on Friday October 21, 2022 @10:41AM (#33288477)

Very cool but I don't care about saving humanity either, parent of parent asked a valid question and "FSF says so" with some hand wavy rationale is just not a very satisfying answer.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Stable Diffusion 1.5 by bee_rider on Friday October 21, 2022 @10:55AM (#33288646)

They call it a "nuclear option" which generally implies some level of effectiveness. The fact that nobody would agree to go along with this sort of scheme renders it ineffective. This isn't a nuclear option, it is a wet fart option.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Stable Diffusion 1.5 by machinawhite on Friday October 21, 2022 @01:22PM (#33290626)

Thank you, that makes some sense.

I'm not trying to be contrarian here, I was curious why not and why this isn't a thing already. I'm just more of a programmer guy and less of a lawyer guy

[ Parent | on HN ]