Stable Diffusion 1.5

Re:Stable Diffusion 1.5 by krainboltgreene on Friday October 21, 2022 @04:02AM (#33285667)

> People don't want to seriously grapple with these sorts of harm reduction arguments

Because there's no evidence it works and the idea makes no fucking sense. It approaches the problem in a way that all experts agree is wrong.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Stable Diffusion 1.5 by miracle2k on Friday October 21, 2022 @05:51AM (#33286327)

> Because there's no evidence it works and the idea makes no fucking sense. It approaches the problem in a way that all experts agree is wrong.

Experts in what exactly?

There are two ways to defend a law that penalizes virtual child pornography:

- On evidence that there is harm.

- On general moral terms, aka "we just don't like that this is happening".

Worth noting that a ban on generated CSAM images was struck down as unconstitutional in Ashcroft_v._Free_Speech_Coalition.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Stable Diffusion 1.5 by Huh1337 on Friday October 21, 2022 @06:34AM (#33286545)

To ban something you need evidence that it's causing some harm, not vice versa.

[ Parent | on HN ]