Re:Simple, Fast, and Scalable Reverse Image Search
by swyx on Wednesday October 19, 2022 @10:14AM
(#33262508)
something i felt was missing from the piece - what is the typical hamming distance cutoff for something like this? he explains 2 is small enough to be identical but presumably it can go really high. what happens with a distance of like 100? what's the state of research on false positives and adversarial attacks?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Simple, Fast, and Scalable Reverse Image Search
by starkd on Wednesday October 19, 2022 @10:17AM
(#33262559)
It's tricky. You have to customize it. But any index method needs a fairly low threshold or the search devolves to a linear search. But as you increase the threshold, you quickly reach a cutoff where it's all just completely dissimilar images. So, a threshold of 100 would be utterly pointless.
Re:Simple, Fast, and Scalable Reverse Image Search
by dark_pattern on Wednesday October 19, 2022 @06:03PM
(#33268433)
It'll depend on your needs, you have to compute your precision against recall to then decide what is a good cutoff for your application