Re:LFMs and LFSPs (Michael Vanier via PG)
by tuukkah on Monday July 09, 2007 @11:58AM
(#33259)
Ruby and C++ both have a complex syntax, nevermind that being superficial. The LFSP example in the article was Ocaml, which doesn't even have operator overloading! What makes Ocaml an LFSP - the little I know about it - includes a nice combination of FP and OO plus a powerful type system.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.