News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:LFMs and LFSPs (Michael Vanier via PG) by tuukkah on Monday July 09, 2007 @11:58AM (#33259)
Ruby and C++ both have a complex syntax, nevermind that being superficial. The LFSP example in the article was Ocaml, which doesn't even have operator overloading! What makes Ocaml an LFSP - the little I know about it - includes a nice combination of FP and OO plus a powerful type system.

There are no comments on this comment yet.