News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GitHub Copi­lot inves­ti­ga­tion by AmericanChopper on Monday October 17, 2022 @07:32PM (#33240973)
The Luddite reaction to copilot is very hilarious to me. It seem to be a great way to identify low-talent coders, because who else would possibly feel so threatened by an AI?… Watching HN commenters suddenly become ardent defenders of copyright is quite the sight.
Re:GitHub Copi­lot inves­ti­ga­tion by batmanturkey on Monday October 17, 2022 @08:48PM (#33241623)
I see your statement as an inversion of consensus reality. What actual coder would use copilot? A beginner or dabbler.

I predict your attempt at tactically “managing” this copilot scandal will not play well on HN to experienced coders, your Microsoft colleagues chiming in next claiming it boosts their productivity notwithstanding.

Yes, I do indeed suggest astroturfing afoot.

Re:GitHub Copi­lot inves­ti­ga­tion by AmericanChopper on Monday October 17, 2022 @08:53PM (#33241671)
I tried it out, but I don’t use it at all on a day-to-day basis. I have no idea if it boosts productivity or not. I also have no idea how you came up with the claim that it’s only for beginners, I’m presuming you just made this up? All of the people that I’ve noticed talking publicly about their experiences using it are highly experienced engineers.

I just think it’s hilarious how fair use is so widely supported on HN when it comes to music, or videos, or interface names, but all of a sudden is a moral crisis when it appears to threaten the value of HN member’s labor.

Re:GitHub Copi­lot inves­ti­ga­tion by ptmcc on Monday October 17, 2022 @10:59PM (#33242468)
Caring about licenses, fair use, and copyright has been deeply ingrained in the open source and hacker community for literally decades.
Re:GitHub Copi­lot inves­ti­ga­tion by AmericanChopper on Monday October 17, 2022 @11:01PM (#33242475)
Caring about defending peoples right to fair use has been. Which is the exact opposite of the Luddite reaction to copilot.