However submitting bugs and feature requests with examples would be better. Many reports are fixed quite quickly. I did not manage to find the bugs you filed though: http://youtrack.jetbrains.net/issues?q=%23rkalla
I can't find older bugs, but the most recent one was this one: http://youtrack.jetbrains.net/issue/IDEA-28895?query=voted+b...
I don't know what happened between the report and the fix in 10.x, but I didn't notice changed behavior. The formatter still didn't wrap correctly for me and indent.
For example, take this:
/* This is a really long line */
and turn it into: /*
* This is a really
* long line.
*/
IIRC what it did was break the line but not prefix it with star, or it prefixed it but put no space between star and the chars... something like that.It also didn't handle longer // comments well from what I remember and most importantly would mangle the HTML embedded in my Javadoc comments.
These are little touches that Eclipse takes care to handle... like ul-li lists inside of Javadoc that it will leave as a list and not try and compact down into a run on sentence.
Or things like p-tags formatted nicely as paragraphs.
I literally just want the default formatter from Eclipse in IJ and I'd be a happy camper.
I am surprised more people don't notice these discrepancies, but I don't want to be the only one pestering the IJ team for these fixes. They have plenty of other things to work on.
As I said I like to write a lot of comments; so I notice this more than most. I don't think I represent the norm here.
I am very verbose commenter for both other people coming behind me (in closed or open source software[1]) as well as myself a year down the road going back through thick code and needing to get back up to speed on it.
Because of this I frequently use HTML formatting in my Javadoc (lists, code snippets, etc.) and find Eclipse's Javadoc formatter more or less perfect.
It breaks lines exactly like I want it to, leaves blank lines entact where I want it to, etc.
I've attempted to file bugs for IntelliJ over the years to refine their Javadoc formatter and they have been fixed, but it still misses the boat on complex single, multi-line or Javadoc comments that requires hand-editing.
I know it's silly, I just can't get over that.
I also find the module/web/deployment/artifact model untenable; but even that I could get around if I had an effective formatter. (FWIW the Eclipse/WTP model is just as stupid when it comes to J2EE project modeling, so no one wins that battle)
[1] http://www.thebuzzmedia.com/downloads/software/imgscalr/java...