Re:XCheck at Meta: Why it exists and how it works
by etchalon on Sunday October 16, 2022 @03:15PM
(#33226350)
There are no laws which say a company has to be transparent and accurate when discussing its moderation systems.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:XCheck at Meta: Why it exists and how it works
by lmm on Sunday October 16, 2022 @05:24PM
(#33227321)
Given that people pay to advertise on facebook, any false statements they make about their moderation systems via the internet almost certainly constitute wire fraud.
Re:XCheck at Meta: Why it exists and how it works
by pavlov on Sunday October 16, 2022 @07:17PM
(#33228076)
You make that claim with a high level of confidence, but have you actually read the contract in place between Meta and the advertiser?
Re:XCheck at Meta: Why it exists and how it works
by lmm on Sunday October 16, 2022 @07:33PM
(#33228172)
No, but I've read the relevant section of the USC. Statutes override contracts, you can't contract out of being bound by the law of the land.
Re:XCheck at Meta: Why it exists and how it works
by etchalon on Sunday October 16, 2022 @11:10PM
(#33229491)
It would almost certainly not.
Re:XCheck at Meta: Why it exists and how it works
by nocoiner on Sunday October 16, 2022 @08:52PM
(#33228691)
As Matt Levine says, “everything is securities fraud,” and this is probably the area of greatest exposure for a company with a substantial degree of departure between their stated practices and their actual practices.
It’s not likely to be more than a nuisance to defend and not terribly expensive to settle, but an enterprising plaintiff’s lawyer could probably find a cause of action that passes summary judgment.