$100B later, autonomous vehicles are still a car-wreck

Re:$100B later, autonomous vehicles are still a car-wreck by kelnos on Sunday October 16, 2022 @01:06PM (#33225242)

That counterargument only holds if Tesla can build software that can approximate the human brain. I think it's laughable to expect they can do that, at least on any reasonable timeframe.

Even if they could, a goal of self driving should be to do better than a human driver. Avoiding technology that can "see" in ways a human cannot is just short-sighted, and a huge missed opportunity.

And all that still even ignores the fact that many common environmental conditions make driving only with human eyes very unsafe. Think fog or heavy rain. A car relying only in cameras to drive in those situations will be next to useless.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:$100B later, autonomous vehicles are still a car-wreck by evandijk70 on Sunday October 16, 2022 @02:29PM (#33225960)

Why is it laughable that Tesla can build software that approximates the human brain? There is software that is better at chess, better at go and better at poker than humans. Why is driving so special?

Agree with your other points.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:$100B later, autonomous vehicles are still a car-wreck by rnjesus on Monday October 17, 2022 @08:48PM (#33241622)

i agree with the principle of your comment, but pure games like the ones you mentioned seem like they would be much easier for a machine to solve. traffic and driving are more complex and require much faster response times, not to mention the high variability (and the literal speed) of factors

[ Parent | on HN ]