Re:Jessica Wade made more than 1k Wikipedia bios for unknown...
by brap on Sunday October 16, 2022 @12:27PM
(#33224852)
How many people are actually searching for and reading these bios? Is this effort at all useful?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Jessica Wade made more than 1k Wikipedia bios for unknown...
by freebreakfast on Sunday October 16, 2022 @12:41PM
(#33224991)
I cannot answer your questions directly, but page view information is available for all Wikipedia articles.
Re:Jessica Wade made more than 1k Wikipedia bios for unknown...
by brosinante on Sunday October 16, 2022 @12:28PM
(#33224867)
Is read count the metric we're using?
Re:Jessica Wade made more than 1k Wikipedia bios for unknown...
by brap on Sunday October 16, 2022 @12:30PM
(#33224881)
I don't know, but surely there should be a metric, and I don't think number of entries is a good one.
Re:Jessica Wade made more than 1k Wikipedia bios for unknown...
by lucb1e on Sunday October 16, 2022 @12:46PM
(#33225044)
It is also an effect that drives itself. If you look for someone and they essentially don't exist online, you are less likely to tell a friend about this person because you don't learn as much about them, which then drives even fewer views to the page. Now that they exist, it might take years before one can tell something based on views.
Searches are hard to map, because searching for POTUS 2008 might get you to Barack's article... but only if it exists. Wouldn't know that someone was looking for this person if they don't type the name exactly and correctly.