News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on $100B later, autonomous vehicles are still a car-wreck. Parent comment

Re:$100B later, autonomous vehicles are still a car-wreck by nuker on Sunday October 16, 2022 @02:03AM (#33221406)
> since humans reach acceptable safety levels with vision only

No AI (reasoning) exists yet, only Machine Learning. It will take decades if not centuries.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:$100B later, autonomous vehicles are still a car-wreck by ben_w on Sunday October 16, 2022 @04:33AM (#33222097)
Even ignoring that "AI" is generally accepted as a term of art:

What do you mean by "reasoning", such that there is no example of a ML system that does this?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:$100B later, autonomous vehicles are still a car-wreck by nuker on Sunday October 16, 2022 @05:41AM (#33222396)
Nope, not one. And not on any car for sure. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automated_reasoning

From actual AI wiki article: “highly mathematical-statistical machine learning has dominated the field”. This will never be able to drive as good as humans.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:$100B later, autonomous vehicles are still a car-wreck by ben_w on Sunday October 16, 2022 @10:24AM (#33223822)
None of what you have written answers my question (my question wasn't a yes/no one), your quotation isn't in the link, the link is full of examples of things which constitute automated reasoning, and there's no reason for me to doubt the possibility of ML ever achieving what is currently being done by the large number of tiny warm bags of chemicals that is an organic brain.
[ Parent | on HN ]