Re:Sweden’s incoming cabinet says new nuclear reactors will ...
by sunmag on Friday October 14, 2022 @08:15PM
(#33210308)
.. Last I read even the automotive industry had trouble sourcing batteries.
Would be interesting to know how many minutes(seconds?) of electricity we could store in all batteries produces last year should we go all in. This at least battery storage seems naive at such scale.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Sweden’s incoming cabinet says new nuclear reactors will ...
by ncmncm on Friday October 14, 2022 @09:13PM
(#33210623)
The overwhelming majority of utility storage is not, and will not be, in batteries. So, your wishful thinking about battery sourcing is wholly irrelevant.
Re:Sweden’s incoming cabinet says new nuclear reactors will ...
by _-david-_ on Friday October 14, 2022 @10:28PM
(#33211106)
Please stop accusing people of wishing for higher energy prices or being a troll. You have done it on a huge number of posts in this thread. If you want to convince anybody accusing them of wanting something bad is not the way to do it. In fact it makes you look like a troll.
Re:Sweden’s incoming cabinet says new nuclear reactors will ...
by ncmncm on Friday October 14, 2022 @10:57PM
(#33211281)
I have no interest in, or expectation of, convincing trolls of anything.
It suffices that readers know they are being trolled.
Re:Sweden’s incoming cabinet says new nuclear reactors will ...
by anonym29 on Saturday October 15, 2022 @01:31AM
(#33212028)
I've heard of gravity batteries, but they are not a proven technology for utility-scale storage (yet). Can you please elaborate on what utility-scale storage will take the place of our current system whereby production generally scales up and down with demand, which will be more difficult with energy sources that can only produce intermittently like solar and wind? Hydro and wave energy generators look promising for baseline load, but those won't alleviate the need for utility-scale storage altogether, right?