Re:AI Language Models Are Struggling to “Get” Math
by 1024core on Wednesday October 12, 2022 @09:44PM
(#33186188)
See the "joke explaining" examples on Page 36 of the paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.02311 and tell me if it's just "passable garbled nonsense".
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:AI Language Models Are Struggling to “Get” Math
by riskneutral on Wednesday October 12, 2022 @09:57PM
(#33186254)
That's astonishing.
Re:AI Language Models Are Struggling to “Get” Math
by stevenhuang on Thursday October 13, 2022 @01:17AM
(#33187529)
Oo this reminds me. One of my favourite sci-fi novels is The Moon is a Harsh Mistress.
In it, it depicts the growth of a nascent AI from its attempts at understanding humor. The AI befriends a technician and gets the human to rate its own crafted jokes.
Eventually the AI gets really good at telling jokes, and becomes sentient as a result.
It was a very fun take on AI gaining sentience, highly recommended!
Re:AI Language Models Are Struggling to “Get” Math
by mjburgess on Thursday October 13, 2022 @03:43AM
(#33188332)
> 500 bn parameter model
That solution has a compressed representation of half the internet.
NNs are "garabled nonesense" insofar as they try to generalise; insofar as they are search engines, they provide apparent sense by just repeating something in their database (= weights).
Google, likewise, returns joke explanations.