BuiltWith: $14M ARR, no employees

Re:BuiltWith: $14M ARR, no employees by forte124 on Wednesday October 12, 2022 @08:36PM (#33185722)

This is actually really interesting to hear.

I always hear the argument "you don't need a fancy website or UI, when I started my site/app looked like ___"

These people created MVPs in 2010. You're now competing with MVPs that can be built with way more features, the latest tech stacks, and more in the same period of time.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:BuiltWith: $14M ARR, no employees by rising-sky on Wednesday October 12, 2022 @09:39PM (#33186152)

This can proably be attributed to the barrier for entry for competition being so much lower , so the definition of an MVP has changed. And equally, expectations from end users have risen. Recent anecdotal example of this is the frenetic pace of development in the ML/AI space with opensource tools like Stable Diffusion practically almost rendering moot the business model of OpenAI’s DALLE-2.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:BuiltWith: $14M ARR, no employees by ehnto on Thursday October 13, 2022 @02:35AM (#33187945)

To win out MVPs have to either be a value proposition currently not available that people need, or to win a popularity contest based on UX, design and branding. That there are still project management tools being developed and succeeding in a saturated market tells me that the popularity contest never really stops.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:BuiltWith: $14M ARR, no employees by 55555 on Thursday October 13, 2022 @01:42AM (#33187653)

I also had a successful SAAS around that period while my later ones failed.

Start a SAAS in a new market, not an established one. Back then every market was wide open.

[ Parent | on HN ]