News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple is quietly pushing a TV ad product with media agencies by prometheuspk on Wednesday October 12, 2022 @01:42PM (#33180391)
It's a foundational belief of the social contract we've signed by agreeing to democracy
Re:Apple is quietly pushing a TV ad product with media agencies by stormbrew on Wednesday October 12, 2022 @01:45PM (#33180429)
Democracy exists at all because people did not follow a blind adherence to law.

At any rate, "the law" is a body of rules so large and complex that likely almost no one actually manages to get through a month without breaking it a couple times.

Re:Apple is quietly pushing a TV ad product with media agencies by LocalH on Wednesday October 12, 2022 @02:02PM (#33180650)
I agreed to no such thing. The social contract I've been forced into seems to have a lot to do with enriching power and moneyed interests, at the expense of the individual. I want no part of that.
Re:Apple is quietly pushing a TV ad product with media agencies by themitigating on Wednesday October 12, 2022 @03:06PM (#33181559)
In a democracy you don't always get what you want
Re:Apple is quietly pushing a TV ad product with media agencies by dexterdog on Wednesday October 12, 2022 @03:26PM (#33181819)
Please show me where I signed
Re:Apple is quietly pushing a TV ad product with media agencies by samatman on Wednesday October 12, 2022 @05:10PM (#33183283)
> The Constitution has no inherent authority or obligation. It has no authority or obligation at all, unless as a contract between man and man. And it does not so much as even purport to be a contract between persons now existing. It purports, at most, to be only a contract between persons living eighty years ago. And it can be supposed to have been a contract then only between persons who had already come to years of discretion, so as to be competent to make reasonable and obligatory contracts. Furthermore, we know, historically, that only a small portion even of the people then existing were consulted on the subject, or asked, or permitted to express either their consent or dissent in any formal manner. Those persons, if any, who did give their consent formally, are all dead now. Most of them have been dead forty, fifty, sixty, or seventy years. And the Constitution, so far as it was their contract, died with them. They had no natural power or right to make it obligatory upon their children. It is not only plainly impossible, in the nature of things, that they could bind their posterity, but they did not even attempt to bind them. That is to say, the instrument does not purport to be an agreement between any body but “the people” then existing; nor does it, either expressly or impliedly, assert any right, power, or disposition, on their part, to bind any body but themselves.

Lysander Spooner goes on to expand this theme greatly.

Foundational essay, well worth a read: https://oll.libertyfund.org/title/spooner-no-treason-no-vi-t...