Re:Authors’ names have ‘astonishing’ influence on peer revie...
by DemeterFarm on Wednesday October 12, 2022 @12:25AM
(#33172838)
Maybe someone in your field would know, is there any difference in the actual reliability/reproducibility difference in research done by men and women? Maybe you are simply measuring a real phenomenon but in a round about way?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Authors’ names have ‘astonishing’ influence on peer revie...
by goto11 on Wednesday October 12, 2022 @02:22AM
(#33173537)
The OP mention it is the same text which is rated differently depending on the gender of the author.
Re:Authors’ names have ‘astonishing’ influence on peer revie...
by emacsen on Wednesday October 12, 2022 @07:58AM
(#33175670)
This was one of the few factors we kept the same- same text.
I think if it had been a larger study (not a one credit class run by 4 undergrads but an actual study with funding) we might have had multiple texts and randomized them, but we had one text- I don't even remember what the topic was.