News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on 'How the Hell Did Document Leak?' – Meta Internal Mail After a News Report. Parent comment

Re:'How the Hell Did Document Leak?' – Meta Internal Mail Af... by mandeepj on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @03:36PM (#33168180)
> any emails sent from andy et al would be " @meta ," not " @fb"

Right! The reasonings does not make any sense, especially the above. Why would FB change its email addresses to Meta? Their stock ticker is still FB.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:'How the Hell Did Document Leak?' – Meta Internal Mail Af... by colejohnson66 on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @03:47PM (#33168341)
> Why would FB change its email addresses to Meta?

To go all in on the name change? `@fb.com` will probably just forward.

> Their stock ticker is still FB.

Not true since June 9[0]. Their NASDAQ ticker is $META[1]. Links to $FB[2] redirect to the correct one.

[0]: https://www.forbes.com/advisor/investing/facebook-ticker-cha...

[1]: https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/meta

[2]: https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/fb

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:'How the Hell Did Document Leak?' – Meta Internal Mail Af... by mandeepj on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @04:34PM (#33168893)
> Not true since June 9[0]. Their NASDAQ ticker is $META[1]. Links to $FB[2] redirect to the correct one.

Indeed! Thanks for the correction.

https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/META?p=META&.tsrc=fin-srch

[ Parent | on HN ]