Re:Spanish airline reserves 10 Airlander airships from Bedfo...
by smcl on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @09:54AM
(#33163394)
While it's true that if you are connecting a completely disconnected city to a network then you'll need to lay some new track to ensure you can get there to the intended destinations. But if you're connecting it to N cities you won't need to lay N new lines, you might get away with a couple. There may be reasons to add or update infrastucture, but not every pair of connected cities needs its own dedicated track
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Spanish airline reserves 10 Airlander airships from Bedfo...
by JumpCrisscross on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @10:21AM
(#33163701)
> if you're connecting it to N cities you won't need to lay N new lines, you might get away with a couple
Trains accelerate slowly. Adding stops non-linearly increases travel time [1]. A few extra stops might thus make total travel time by train meaningfully more than by air.
[1] https://blog.bimajority.org/2018/10/20/interlude-physics-of-...
Re:Spanish airline reserves 10 Airlander airships from Bedfo...
by smcl on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @10:36AM
(#33163862)
In some cases air will be faster than trains, and in some cases trains will be faster than air travel. I don't think anyone disputes this. It's certainly not true that you just add one new line to connect a location to a rail network and magically get all the promised benefits and more, but see:
> There may be reasons to add or update infrastucture ...
As long as we're talking in abstract we can construct scenarios where one is faster or better. However my read the original comment was that that adding a new connection involves adding new infrastructure, which isn't always true.