News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Google plasma globe affair of 2012 by tellmemore145 on Monday October 10, 2022 @05:55PM (#33156848)
Can you link to one of these watches? If they're being sold with that purpose-build functionality, that's probably a federal crime. You cannot make, possess, or operate a signal jammer in the US.
Re:The Google plasma globe affair of 2012 by EthicalSimilar on Monday October 10, 2022 @06:34PM (#33157188)
From what I briefly remember, they aren’t jammers. They’re more akin to a DoS to the access point (I think it has something to do with spamming auth requests?) than jamming any physical signals.
Re:The Google plasma globe affair of 2012 by tgsovlerkhgsel on Monday October 10, 2022 @07:08PM (#33157466)
They aren't jammers in the "blast out RF noise" sense, but since they are meant to disrupt legitimate communications, the FCC considers them jammers and has repeatedly fined companies that run deauth attacks to "encourage" people to use their paid networks: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/fcc-issues-another-fine-fo...
Re:The Google plasma globe affair of 2012 by EthicalSimilar on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @07:33AM (#33162066)
I see, thanks for the clarification
Re:The Google plasma globe affair of 2012 by tellmemore145 on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @02:29AM (#33160108)
As tgsovlerkhgsel said, they're not the classic style of jammer. That kind of thing is called a "smart jammer". And if you built that exact kind of functionality into a device and sold it (vs. just allowing the customer to code it themselves, like they could on any wifi device), you are probably committing a felony by manufacturing and selling a signal jammer.