>I beg to differ. Maybe you think cultists should be killed, but I think they should be helped to understand their relationship and find a way to free themselves from that control.

The very fact you are calling somebody a stochastic terrorist is in fact stochastic terrorism.

Why do you think I think cultists should be killed?

Regardless, just because I don't think cultists should be killed doesn't mean your rhetoric isn't likely to cause violence. That is the only thing that matters when it comes to stochastic terrorism.

>I'm also curious as to what you think comprises a cult and any examples of such. And if one is a member of a cult how that person should be "dealt with".

You are the one calling people cultists. You should be defining it not me.

>I'm also curious as to if there is anything that Trump could do or say that would cause you to no longer support him

What makes you think I support Trump? I just don't like giant multi billion dollar companies suppressing speech under false pretenses. I would be making the same arguments for any person removed under false pretenses.

>My goal of engaging with you is not to make you wrong or me right -- it's about finding some common areas of agreement that we can find come together as a country to make things better. It unfortunately looks like that may not be possible and that fills me with despair.

Maybe we can find common ground on these statements:

- social media companies should not lie about their reasons on banning people.

- social media companies should have specific and clear rules

- social media companies should only ban people for violating their rules or when directly required to by a legal order