News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Learn Exponentially by pkilgore on Sunday October 09, 2022 @12:12PM (#33142556)
Anyone else feel like they just read a bunch of assumptions with no support followed by a chart "proving" an exponential equation grows faster than a linear one?

What the heck am I supposed to take away from this?

This is a half ass theory, not evidence.

Where's a shred of evidence, on the time scales here, these "units of information" are retained (under either method). Are they even relevant compared to a _skill_ like reading that enables quicker information ingestion across an entire life o and is applicable across a wider range of problems than _individual information units you read_??

Re:Learn Exponentially by p-christ on Sunday October 09, 2022 @12:16PM (#33142603)
What bit do you doubt?

The core concept that spaced repetition increases rapidly in effectiveness over time is called the Spacing Effect. There are many many studies that have investigated and proved it

Re:Learn Exponentially by pkilgore on Sunday October 09, 2022 @12:33PM (#33142744)
> It takes you years to get twice as effective at reading

Evidence? What's the evidence this is a linear growth process? How many years? At what age? What populations? There is no rigor here at all.

Re:Learn Exponentially by p-christ on Monday October 10, 2022 @02:09AM (#33148312)
The article links to a paper which estimates how much more effective you get at reading the more knowledge you have. It shows that for most ages you don't improve in this way, but for older ages you do.

Then I say for the "best case" that "adults" takes years to get twice as effective at reading.

If you don't believe this then it means you think it takes adults less than a year to get twice as effective? If effectiveness doubles each year then that would mean by the time a 25 year old becomes 65 that they're 1 million times as effective at reading than when they were 25. Does that sound reasonable to you?

Re:Learn Exponentially by pkilgore on Sunday October 09, 2022 @12:29PM (#33142711)
"Proved" is not a word used in any physiological research I've ever been familiar with, at least not with paragraph, if not pages of qualification. Would you please link me to this proof?
Re:Learn Exponentially by p-christ on Sunday October 09, 2022 @12:40PM (#33142796)
Agree, I shouldn't have used the word "proved". But there is a lot of robust evidence for it going back to the 1800s. Many of the studies are linked to on the wikipedia page

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacing_effect

Re:Learn Exponentially by fedeb95 on Sunday October 09, 2022 @02:44PM (#33144046)
Starting from smokey definitions such as "potential", and that learning equals memorising.
Re:Learn Exponentially by themenomen on Sunday October 09, 2022 @11:22PM (#33147427)
Well, for me, this article and the previous one that was on HN some weeks ago were just propaganda to push the service they promote for eventual monetization. Something wrong with it? I don't know, well may be just lack of transparency I guess.