Sort of like how Apple gave users the ability to consent and they overwhelmingly withheld it (to the chagrin of FB).

If someone learns they're watched via cameras while in a grocery store, they may not be happy about it but they'll also generally recognize they're on _STORE PROPERTY_.

The key difference here is that this is being done on the _USERS_ property and you're acting as if they shouldn't have to right to withhold that consent.

---

Everyone accepts that an employer may look through company emails of its employees because it goes through company equipment.

These same companies then have the unadulterated gall to turn around and try and claim they have those very same rights on _OTHER PEOPLES EQUIPMENT_.

They're laying claim to other peoples compute.