Re:Granting Pardon for the Offense of Simple Possession of M...
by ckw on Friday October 07, 2022 @01:54AM
(#33117887)
Better still when they do the right thing for reasons of principle.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Granting Pardon for the Offense of Simple Possession of M...
by dr_dshiv on Friday October 07, 2022 @02:15AM
(#33118003)
The system is best where moral actions emerge from rational self interest. E.g., being trustworthy is moral but also good for business. We want systems like that.
Re:Granting Pardon for the Offense of Simple Possession of M...
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th on Friday October 07, 2022 @09:02AM
(#33120675)
horse and cart.
It's good for business BECAUSE it's moral.
Re:Granting Pardon for the Offense of Simple Possession of M...
by dr_dshiv on Friday October 07, 2022 @02:40PM
(#33125304)
Not sure I agree. Paying doctors to promote pills is good for business but doesn’t seem very moral, per se.
Re:Granting Pardon for the Offense of Simple Possession of M...
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th on Friday October 07, 2022 @03:56PM
(#33126174)
You're making my point for me.
That only works for those doctors when there's no transparency that they're being paid for it.
Re:Granting Pardon for the Offense of Simple Possession of M...
by tchaffee on Friday October 07, 2022 @07:05AM
(#33119692)
Not necessarily. A politician doing the right thing for reasons of principal and ignoring elections could result in a loss of power for the entire party. If those who gain power are truly evil then what you've done is lost sight of a far bigger "right thing" by insisting on being principled in every small action. Political naivety is a very poor excuse for doing a "right thing" that eventually causes great harm. Especially for an experienced politician.